Treasury: 7,108,618 [178.5 days of tax]
That is on Eternal's profile. Thought you said you changed it so you couldn't have over 90 days Ender?
2011-08-06 22:15:16
[13 years, 142 days ago] |
Treasury: 7,108,618 [178.5 days of tax] That is on Eternal's profile. Thought you said you changed it so you couldn't have over 90 days Ender? |
2011-08-06 22:18:48
[13 years, 142 days ago] |
We hacks =) I dont think the treasury works fully well everywhere though, and not instantly that sure. |
Vector [114] <Solo Act>
2011-08-07 01:33:25
[13 years, 142 days ago] |
Treasury: 2,390,256 [200.3 days of tax] |
2011-08-07 06:22:57
[13 years, 142 days ago] |
There are ways. Worked in BOTS2, still works here. |
2011-08-07 11:44:37
[13 years, 141 days ago] |
I know how to get over 90. I'm just saying, Ender would make it so at all times, there was a max of 90. |
Tabby Ridiman [62] 2011-08-07 11:50:39
[13 years, 141 days ago] |
so enlighten us and tell us how to do it |
2011-08-07 12:31:17
[13 years, 141 days ago] |
Have high level bots join the clan. Fill the treasury and leave. |
001 [86] 2011-08-07 13:46:23
[13 years, 141 days ago] |
This "bug" is hardly something that should be wasted time on. |
2011-08-07 14:37:12
[13 years, 141 days ago] |
1,220,850 [375.3 days of tax] we win :) and by we i mean i |
Decay [47] 2011-08-07 14:50:46
[13 years, 141 days ago] |
agree with neps, really not a concern |
2011-08-07 16:02:05
[13 years, 141 days ago] |
If this isn't a concern. Then no bug is a concern. |
2011-08-07 16:11:01
[13 years, 141 days ago] |
That's a bit too black & white :P |
2011-08-07 16:12:17
[13 years, 141 days ago] |
:) |
2011-08-07 16:20:25
[13 years, 141 days ago] |
If this isn't a concern. Then no bug is a concern. Hasty Generalization Hasty generalization is a logical fallacy of faulty generalization by reaching an inductive generalization based on insufficient evidence. It commonly involves basing a broad conclusion upon the statistics of a survey of a small group that fails to sufficiently represent the whole population.[1] Its opposite fallacy is called slothful induction, or denying the logical conclusion of an inductive argument (i.e. "it was just a coincidence"). Examples Person A travels through Town X for the first time. He sees 10 people, all of them children. Person A returns to his town and reports that there are no adult residents in Town X. Person A and Person B walk past a pawn shop. Person A remarks that a watch in a window display looks like the one his grandfather used to wear. On the basis of this remark, Person B concludes that: Person A's grandfather pawned his watch; or Person A's grandfather had expensive tastes in jewelry; or Person A's grandfather was ostentatious; or Person A's grandfather cannot tell the time any more. Context is also relevant; in mathematics the Pólya conjecture is true for numbers less than 906,150,257, but fails for this number. Assuming something to be true for all numbers when it has been shown for over 906 million cases would not generally be considered hasty, but in mathematics a statement remains a conjecture until it is shown to be universally true. Hasty generalization is also the basis for racist beliefs and prejudices - a person will infer an attribute to be common to all members of a group based on knowledge of only a small sample size of that group. For example, the belief that a given person who is Jewish will be a greedy and nit-picky, the belief because a person is black, (s)he will be loud, poor, and criminal, or the belief that because a person is white, (s)he is lazy, overweight, arrogant, lack style, and have unearned or unwarranted wealth. This includes positive racist ideologies as well, such as the belief that Asians are better off academically than other racial sectors. Alternative names The fallacy is also known as: fallacy of insufficient statistics, fallacy of insufficient sample, generalization from the particular, leaping to a conclusion, hasty induction, law of small numbers, unrepresentative sample, and secundum quid. When referring to a generalization made from a single example it has been called the fallacy of the lonely fact or the proof by example fallacy. When evidence is intentionally excluded to bias the result, it is sometimes termed the fallacy of exclusion and is a form of selection bias. |
2011-08-07 16:24:05
[13 years, 141 days ago] |
Okay? |
Administrator 2011-08-07 17:14:47
[13 years, 141 days ago] |
Treasury: 7,108,618 [178.5 days of tax] Haven't written that yet.
Hmm? |
2011-08-08 05:53:54
[13 years, 141 days ago] |
I thought I saw clan treasury fixing itself before, but might just be a wrong memory, I know I first posted the bug and u said you will look into it- and shortly after I saw some clans having the correct tax so I assumed it was fixed :P |
Persephone [20] 2011-08-09 05:38:05
[13 years, 140 days ago] |
Treasury: 96,930 [12116.3 days of tax] Nope, not fixed XD |
2011-08-09 05:40:43
[13 years, 140 days ago] |
You're set for the next 30 years to come ;) |
Persephone [20] 2011-08-09 05:43:22
[13 years, 140 days ago] |
Hahaha yup! |
2011-08-18 17:52:00
[13 years, 130 days ago] |
2,509,820 [39215.9 days of tax] |
klassick [120] <Solo Act>
2011-08-18 23:13:04
[13 years, 130 days ago] |
^Loser :P |
2011-08-19 00:32:45
[13 years, 130 days ago] |
roflmfao |