2,100,000 Crystalized Armour body 525 255
FUCK THE U.
love you all, 'cept the random u users.
complaints
|
|
|
fuck u |
|
fuck you and fuck me to |
ignacio [92] |
hmmmm robot sex O.o |
|
:( |
|
yep.. thats the future |
ignacio [92] |
dnt get sad get glad :) atleast dere no robot aids...yet |
|
Robo-Erotica?? omg wtf ffs...bbq? |
<No Clan>
|
Yeah fuck these stupid fucking tards. |
ignacio [92] |
rather american or not really not going to stop ppl from making stupid slash worthless treds bt im glad for them some are fun |
|
Words like flavour, honour and neighbour are just plain ugly without the u.. |
|
no one uses those words in america except fags and women |
ignacio [92] |
cuz they yanks lol |
|
yeah i dont like american spellin... its wierd for me |
|
america is the boss, you listen to us. |
|
"no one uses those words in america except fags and women" |
|
You would wager 4% of america's men are gay? |
|
im from australia, best country in the world!! |
|
Between 5 and 10% is. I doubt american men are the exception. |
|
that would explain alot |
ignacio [92] |
i just don't like it when someone writes like this: yo holw u duin, is it so hard to spell right lol or at most make it so ppl know what you talking about |
|
Last census puts it about about .7% of men are gay in USA |
ignacio [92] |
lol then we must have 5% of them here in south florida :p |
|
It's easier to notice people who are different than ones that are not. |
ignacio [92] |
not always |
|
I would go as far to say its the going rule. |
|
I doubt 'are you gay' was a question on a government census ^^. And if it was, and i was, i wouldn't check it. Government has no business in private lives. |
ignacio [93] |
well put my friend ^^ |
|
Oh? What about gays getting married then. That is something the government is in charge of. Plus, I'm sure that the amount of gays that didn't check it there were enough stupids to check it for fun. |
ignacio [93] |
real question is why people so into other peoples lifes? gay or not if two ppl want to be togeter who is anyone to say they cant be? just live your own life and let other live theirs. |
|
Except there are things like, insurance and tax rates for married people. You know, grown up stuff. |
ignacio [93] |
yea still a kid dnt know nothing about that bt i still stand by wat i say |
|
I actually bothered to look it up: |
|
I don't care what gays do in their free time but if they want to get married then good luck trying to get a law like that passed in the US. |
GessGuitar1 [51] |
"Last census puts it about about .7% of men are gay in USA " |
|
Does your 2-13% include women aswell? so 1-6.5 for men alone which would make 5 a high middle ground. |
ignacio [93] |
good job jans this is why me and tonto love you lol and um i think up north gays can get married |
|
How does their marriage affect you? You have to get them a wedding gift? ^^ |
|
It affects marriage and tax rates. Profit margins for companies providing benefits to married couples, ect. |
ignacio [93] |
jajaja hmmm i will give them jans ^_^ |
|
lol you cant split a percentage in half like that :P 10% of population does NOT mean 5% of men, 5% of women. |
|
What would it mean then? |
|
You serious? i'm sorry, serios* |
|
Population = 1000 (male 500, female 500) |
|
25 male rednecks, 5 % of the males are rednecks. |
|
Ah, I see. You doubled your percentage after the split by only including half of the population. |
|
it just means 10%... with no factoring of male or female. |
|
My point still stands as I see it tho'.... |
|
which point? |
|
What percenatage of population are male rednecks? |
|
"It affects marriage and tax rates. Profit margins for companies providing benefits to married couples, ect. " |
|
You keep relating everything back to male and female specific. When I split the percentage it was still alluding to the population as a whole. Which then relates back to 'only gay men and women use those words'. |
|
Not just tax benefits! Company profits too. I don't want my 401k to take a hit. |
|
You're a sexist and a bigot, but i still love you. Wanna elope? ;) |
|
Hey now, I take offense to that. My girlfriends uncle(s) are gay and life partners with each other.(not related, you know what I mean) |
gr33nII [67] |
that's a yes Jans, congratulations. |
|
Fine, i'll substitute bigot with selfish. Your uncles-in-law can't get benefits because it might affect your tax rate :) |
|
Hey, I can blame the baby boomer generation all I want no matter their sexual orientation. Fuckers stuck a bunch of IOU's in social security for social projects so now when they want to get money out cause they are old they are like 'fuck we don't have any money' and my generation gets a big fat cock in our ass. |
|
I C WHAT U DID DERE |
|
I am slightly surprised at how far off topic this thread got. |
gr33nII [67] |
Sparkling crystal armour sounds pretty close to the current subject. |
|
Yeuh, gauy spaurkly armor is toutally funnuy stufuf. |
Head Moderator |
hoorah for "u's" \o/ |
|
It is kinda fun to just throw them in everywhere, you silly europeans :) |
Belgarath [55] |
So if I marry Lunchbox, we´ll get more benefits? Sweet! |
|
I wonder if ender actually read this and was as entertained as I was in the thought train. |
Administrator |
I read the first few posts, then saw how long the thread was and didn't read the rest. |
|
There is some very useful information in there about statistics and gays and political conundrums! :P |
|
Bump for great justice! |
|
>I am slightly surprised at how far off topic this thread got. |
|
>I read the first few posts, then saw how long the thread was and didn't read the rest. |
|
I bet he's been waiting to see who'd catch that. Nevermind, he's offline. |
steener [75] |
I would just like to throw my two cents in. Up here in Canada gay marriage is legal, there was two American men who paid for a flight that flys along the border of the US and Canada to fly over the border for 15 minutes (into Canada) so they could legally get married. Must have been pricey to pay the pilot to do that but at least they got what they wanted :) |
|
Bloody hell, next thing you americans will be asking for the robot in the showroom to be slightly enlarged... |
|
I think people missed the point that jans and I were not arguing about gay marriage and if it is right or not, but on the percentage of people that use words that could contain the letter 'u' in the United States. |
|
The majority of the population! You're surrounded by u-users! Buehehe |
|
But none of them really matter. |
|
That's a different discussion. |
|
That is splitting the hairs pretty fine if you want to exclude that. Going by that reasoning your 'surrounded by u-users' comment would be fair game to be going off-topic. |
Head Moderator |
I agree with Jans. |
|
Whether you think they matter or not is irrelevant, they're still part of the population, which is what we were talking about. Or was it? Wait what was the point again? :P |
|
Your opinion doesn't matter, see rest of thread. |
|
Can we get this topic back on track? |
Head Moderator |
Good luck silencing me :) |
|
The point was what percent of the population would use words that would contain that surreptitious u you euro throw in everywhere. |
Head Moderator |
& by your own twisted logic 55% of yanks do. |
|
They would use words that you could, by your standards, throw in random u's for funzies. Not that they do, of course. |
|
Wait, I thought that that 55% was the percent of americans that were female and/or gay. Or rednecks and/or gay. Or something. Point is, this topic has gotten way out of hand. |
|
You can thank jans for trying to confuse us all so that he can win a disagreement. |