I currently have 122 wins and 1 loss, but did not receive the plat achievement for 100 ratio with at least 100 wins.
bugs
Ambrosio [32] 2011-07-16 15:26:40
[13 years, 132 days ago] |
|
Ambrosio [32] 2011-07-16 15:31:49
[13 years, 132 days ago] |
See? All the other achievements appear instantly, is something bugged with this one? |
Saiyan Z [139] 2011-07-16 15:35:19
[13 years, 132 days ago] |
Looks like bug. Only thing I can think of is that the achievement pops up if you have NaN with over 100 wins and then get a loss. So bugged. |
2011-07-16 20:03:31
[13 years, 132 days ago] |
looks like its there now |
2011-07-16 20:28:13
[13 years, 132 days ago] |
Had the same issue on one of my bots, i relogged and it appeared once i came online again. |
<123>
2011-07-17 05:55:25
[13 years, 132 days ago] |
I think a lot of achievements come with a delay now, ever since Ender fixed it, so achievements don't spoil you about the ending of a fight. |
Saiyan Z [140] 2011-07-17 06:00:27
[13 years, 132 days ago] |
Don't think there is any delay at the moment. The training bot achievements pop up as soon as the fights start. I didn't mind though. Nice to know that I was going to win and then look at how the fight played out. |
2011-07-17 06:11:38
[13 years, 132 days ago] |
Although I cannot confirm this myself, I do believe if you're NaN (With 100+ wins) and get beaten whilst offline the achievement doesn't pop. |
2011-07-17 06:15:21
[13 years, 132 days ago] |
Nah, that's not the issue as I got mine when I logged back in after losing offline. |
2011-07-17 07:49:36
[13 years, 131 days ago] |
True, that was a single loss leaving you >100 though. If you were beaten a few times leaving you <100 I don't think the achievement would have popped. |
<123>
2011-07-17 10:55:26
[13 years, 131 days ago] |
Ahh. So, due to the current bug, to get this achievement you must: A. have a ratio of 100.0 or greater B. be online during the time that you have the ratio, before you lose it. So if you lose the ratio before you log in (say, have 102 wins and 2 losses) the achievement doesn't check? |
2011-07-17 13:19:45
[13 years, 131 days ago] |
I can confirm this isn't the case. My mistake, ignore what I said. |
Damankova [27] 2011-07-18 16:34:15
[13 years, 130 days ago] |
If you have 100+ wins and are NaN and you get your fist loss, the achievement will display after your next victory. |
Damankova [27] 2011-07-18 16:34:33
[13 years, 130 days ago] |
*first |
Administrator 2011-07-18 17:37:43
[13 years, 130 days ago] |
This sounds bugged. The intended behavior is that you receive the achievement as soon as you have a ratio of at least 100.0 and at least 100 wins, regardless of whether you're online/offline, NaN or not, attacked or defended, etc. I made a note to look into it when I get back from vacation. |
2011-07-26 08:14:04
[13 years, 122 days ago] |
Tried it with this bot, yes, the achievement is bugged. At 100+ wins and no losses, no achievement. At one loss, still none, and at two losses, still none. -neps |
<123>
2011-07-31 05:40:12
[13 years, 118 days ago] |
Probably not, but will fixing this retroactively give the achivement to those who should have it but don't? |
2011-07-31 05:42:08
[13 years, 118 days ago] |
spammer :) |
<123>
2011-07-31 05:49:35
[13 years, 118 days ago] |
No one's awake. :/ |
2011-07-31 06:07:05
[13 years, 118 days ago] |
i am... |
2011-07-31 06:07:47
[13 years, 118 days ago] |
spammers =) |
Administrator 2011-07-31 08:42:50
[13 years, 117 days ago] |
There's unfortunately no way I'd be able to find out who was supposed to have it. :\ I thought it was just being awarded later than it should be though. Is it ending up not being awarded at all to some bots that should have gotten it? That would make this higher priority to fix. |
2011-09-11 03:46:56
[13 years, 76 days ago] |
Was offline, had at least 100 wins and zero losses. Log in back to 9 losses, no ratio trophies. Fought once, win, ended up with 13.44 ratio, received all ratio trophies until 10.00 one, but still no platinum 100.00 ratio trophy. |
2011-09-11 12:33:34
[13 years, 75 days ago] |
same problem. i achieved first 100.still no platinum trophy. |
skipper [1] 2011-09-11 12:50:11
[13 years, 75 days ago] |
i don't know if this makes too much sense but I received all the trophy points after I attacked a higher level bot (8 levels). I've been fighting same level bots to get the wins and after I attacked a higher level bot for level up purposes all the trophies popped |
Administrator 2011-09-11 12:50:48
[13 years, 75 days ago] |
I'll try to fix this today. |
Nosferatu [1] <Solo Act>
2011-09-11 13:01:25
[13 years, 75 days ago] |
In theory, 100.0 ratio shouldn't be given to a bot with a NaN ratio, because it's not a number. But I just recently did a bot with 100 wins 0 losses and then got 1 loss, and there was no trophy, obtained 1 win and got it. |
<123>
2011-09-11 14:00:42
[13 years, 75 days ago] |
i don't know if this makes too much sense but I received all the trophy points after I attacked a higher level bot (8 levels). I've been fighting same level bots to get the wins and after I attacked a higher level bot for level up purposes all the trophies popped The trophies do pop up after the first loss, but sometimes you have to get another win to get the 100.0 one out. And apparantly, if your ratio drops from NaN to something below 100.0 while offline, you won't get the trophy. |
Administrator 2011-09-11 15:10:36
[13 years, 75 days ago] |
I <3 forum search. Here's the intended behavior of this trophy:
Source: http://bots4.net/forum/3/1826 |
Nosferatu [1] <Solo Act>
2011-09-11 15:34:35
[13 years, 75 days ago] |
I understand the "intended" behavior but do you not see my point about NaN not being a number therefor a 100.0 ratio shouldn't apply to NaN bots? |
simplyshredded [54] 2011-09-11 15:41:25
[13 years, 75 days ago] |
nice one Ender, you made me click on the link |
simplyshredded [54] 2011-09-11 15:41:52
[13 years, 75 days ago] |
whiiiich is the same as the thread we're in now |
Administrator 2011-09-11 16:02:12
[13 years, 75 days ago] |
Whoops, I didn't realize I was replying to thread I "found" via search, hence the self-link. As for NaN not counting, you're arguing semantics. |
Administrator 2011-09-11 18:33:28
[13 years, 75 days ago] |
This is fixed now, sorry it took so long. |
Nosferatu [1] <Solo Act>
2011-09-11 19:42:23
[13 years, 75 days ago] |
It's not the time it takes you, it's the fact you care enough to fix them. This is why we really enjoy the game with you behind it at the moment. I'm unclear as to what the future may hold 5-10 years down the road, and that is if the game still exist, but in the present time, you fixing things, that is what's most important to us. At least for me anyway. |
Administrator 2011-09-11 23:56:01
[13 years, 75 days ago] |
Cheers. |
2011-09-12 01:27:00
[13 years, 75 days ago] |
^^ this. |
2011-09-14 00:04:08
[13 years, 73 days ago] |
Glad you found the fix...can you let us know what was causing it? |
Administrator 2011-09-14 20:10:57
[13 years, 72 days ago] |
The function that gives a bot's ratio returns "NaN" if you have no losses. This value was being compared to 1, 2, 5, 10, 100 (all the ratio trophy thresholds) and so things like "NaN" > 100 evaluate to false. This wouldn't have been a problem and would have just meant you were awarded the trophy late as opposed to never (NaN with X+ wins getting a loss results in a X+ ratio), except for the fact that the ratio trophy code only gets executed for the winning bot of a battle. So if you went from 100 wins NaN, loss, loss, no trophy. But if you went 100 wins NaN, loss, win, you got the trophy. The code now uses your wins as your ratio if your ratio is NaN. |
2012-08-04 00:27:54
[12 years, 113 days ago] |
so ... i just got all my ratio trophies (1, 2, 5, 10 and 100) when i hit 100 wins/NaN something needs to be fixed again? |
<123>
2012-08-04 00:30:02
[12 years, 113 days ago] |
What? That's exactly the way it was intended. |
2012-08-04 00:34:38
[12 years, 113 days ago] |
would have thought it to work like:
|
<123>
2012-08-04 00:38:37
[12 years, 113 days ago] |
Might want to re-read the trophy descriptions. :) |
2012-08-04 00:40:58
[12 years, 113 days ago] |
ups ... right forgot that ... >.< |
Nosferatu [155] <Solo Act>
2012-08-04 00:59:48
[12 years, 113 days ago] |
Lmao.... |