suggestions

Forum > Suggestions > Buff Time
Reply To Thread (login)
New Alan [100]
2013-08-04 21:39:26
[11 years, 113 days ago]

I think it would be cool if the buff time would be lowered if you have platinums, like the price of buffs. Maybe at a minimum time of 12hours?


 
Destind [72]
2013-08-04 21:42:16
[11 years, 113 days ago]

the 24 hour limit is good as it limits the amount of energy transferred per day from dumper clans. lowering the time limit would only disadvantage newer bots/players


 
New Alan [100]
2013-08-04 21:44:38
[11 years, 113 days ago]

Ya, I guess that would make it worse. I mean, you can only get good if you put time in anyway. Not everyone should automatically be put on the same playing field. The 60EPH does help.


 
Fishwick [132]
Moderator
2013-08-04 22:20:00
[11 years, 113 days ago]

the 24 hour limit is good as it limits the amount of energy transferred per day from dumper clans. lowering the time limit would only disadvantage newer bots/players

How, exactly? Unless we are talking scatter dumping.

As for the suggestion, meh, it would help me a lot when I score on my trophy bot but I don't think experienced players need more help vs new people.


 
New Alan [100]
2013-08-04 22:37:41
[11 years, 113 days ago]

My main reason is...to buy experience and kudo buffs when making bots, without waiting a day. :P


 
Default User [172]
2013-08-06 19:17:31
[11 years, 111 days ago]

I would have thought that maybe an extra 100 fights on buffs for every 5-10 platinums would have been better


 
ForThePeople [123]
2013-08-09 15:04:05
[11 years, 108 days ago]

Well not quite what I thought alan was going to say when I Opened this, but you could say maybe perhaps eventually sometimes, be allowed to get a timer rest so say you bought a buff at 1 am on august 10th, but you recieved a platnium trophy at 3 am august 10th. The platinum trophy would reset your timer and allow you to purchase another buff.


 
Default User [173]
2013-08-09 15:08:27
[11 years, 108 days ago]

would that include All Star though? otherwise players could just keep donating after the buff runs out


 
Mithrandon [170]
2013-08-09 17:49:32
[11 years, 108 days ago]

you could just make it so only the unlock of a plat would reset the timer, then any repeatable plats wouldn't be abuse-able


 
User Name [310]
2013-08-09 21:47:56
[11 years, 108 days ago]

I don't agree with anything that changes the time lock of the buffs. I think they're set at a very reasonable standard and everyone has to play by the same rules that apply to them.


 
Jans [87]
2013-08-10 01:54:33
[11 years, 107 days ago]

Same ^


 
New Alan [100]
2013-08-10 02:38:52
[11 years, 107 days ago]

So, trophy costs less for more plat owners. Thats not an even playing field. I kind of lost interest in this...


 
Jans [87]
2013-08-10 02:45:24
[11 years, 107 days ago]

I thought the issue was the time lock, not the prices?


 
DarkNinjaMaster [38]
2013-08-10 04:10:22
[11 years, 107 days ago]

So, trophy costs less for more plat owners. Thats not an even playing field. I kind of lost interest in this...

You state this in opening post, then say it like you just found out an now you've lost interest.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a4hFwJm41h4


 
MithranMon [52]
2013-08-10 04:14:56
[11 years, 107 days ago]

triple sarcasm ftw!


 
shoyuken [175]
2013-08-10 08:36:56
[11 years, 107 days ago]

just don't use trophy points like me


 
Wang Wei [70]
2013-08-10 08:39:11
[11 years, 107 days ago]

I don't mind the price reduction it actually makes sense - you do really well and you should a little reward. As for the time lock. 1 a day is fine. It makes it nice and even. That never changes. Unlocking plats to reduce wait time on buff purchases would only tilt the game towards the established.


 
Barricade [146]
2013-08-10 10:13:28
[11 years, 107 days ago]

what about a reshuffle on pricing

150% - 25 200% - 50 250% - 85

and possibly add this ??

300% - 125


 
Jans [87]
2013-08-10 10:15:59
[11 years, 107 days ago]

I understand you want things to be cheaper, but that's not reason enough to do it.


 
Trio [330]
2013-08-10 12:14:34
[11 years, 107 days ago]

I like Default User's suggestion :)


 
Ender [1]
Administrator
2013-08-10 12:31:02
[11 years, 107 days ago]

My position is still that buffs are more OP than I meant them to be, so I won't be allowing them to be bought more frequently.


 
Forum > Suggestions > Buff Time
Reply To Thread (login)